Meta and Google were found liable in a major U.S. case over claims that their platforms were designed in ways that harmed young users, marking a significant legal setback for both companies.
The case centered on a 20-year-old plaintiff who argued that she became addicted to Instagram and YouTube at a young age because of design features built to capture and hold attention. The jury concluded that both companies were negligent in how the platforms were designed and failed to warn users about potential dangers.
The verdict could have major implications for the broader technology sector, as it shifts attention from content itself to the design of social media platforms. That distinction may make it harder for companies to defend themselves in future youth safety cases.
Meta said it disagrees with the verdict and is reviewing legal options, while Google said it plans to appeal. Punitive damages have not yet been decided and will be addressed in a later phase.
The ruling adds to growing legal and political pressure on social media companies over the mental health effects of their products on children and teenagers, with similar cases already moving through U.S. courts.
